Skip to main content

Phoebe is Holden's Relatble Peer


    After discussing the notebook prompt “What would you say to Holden Caulfield?” during class, I find myself agreeing with everyone who thought that Holden needed a peer who could relate to him rather than another person who would just lecture him. So I was reminded of this discussion when I read the pivotal scene between Holden and Phoebe, where Holden decides he will go home instead of running away as he had previously planned. Phoebe arguably plays the role of a relatable peer during this scene, and not only relates to Holden but also scares him. It is jarring for Holden to see Phoebe mirror his own jaded views of the world, so seeing someone that he really cared about “becoming him” seems to be frightening enough that Holden starts to question his own concerning actions and outlook for the first time. 


    It is interesting that Holden’s first reaction to Phoebe's new attitude is shock, even though her plan was the exact same as Holden’s: to run away. He is not only shocked at Phoebe’s determination to run away with him, but also that this is his kid sister who he views as untouched by societal problems that plague him throughout the novel. Then, he develops anger toward the situation when he tells the reader: “I was almost set to hit her” and “I wanted her to cry till her eyes practically dropped out” (267-268). This reminds me of the concern directed towards Holden as a consequence of his actions when people attempt to shake some sense into him, and all ultimately fail. Phoebe’s flippant attitude toward her own life, specifically about the play and going back to school, really alarms Holden as well. He really doesn’t want to see his “kid sister” turn out like he did, and it was strange to watch Holden have the same concerns about Phoebe as others had for him throughout the novel. His discussion with Phoebe ultimately helps Holden realize how his actions affect the people in his life, especially Phoebe and also hopefully how they affect him. 


    All of this led me to think about the significance of the title, The Catcher in The Rye, during this scene. Holden states earlier in the book that he wishes he could be a catcher in the rye when he grows up, which is obviously up for interpretation, but to me it signifies Holden’s obsession with preserving childhood (and particularly its innocence). So during this pivotal conversation between Phoebe and Holden, Holden is metaphorically catching Phoebe, in a struggle to preserve her innocence and therefore her joy. Holden does have a habit of equating the two during his adventures in New York, a child’s joy and innocence. Take for example the child that Holden observes walking and singing, and thinks

He was just singing for the hell of it, you could tell. The cars zoomed by, brakes screeched all over the place, his parents paid no attention to him, and he kept on walking next to the curb and singing 'If a body catch a body coming through the rye'(150).

In particular Holden romanticizes Phoebe’s innocence throughout the novel, especially this idea that she is able to “get him” enough that he feels able to confide in her, and yet also is able to find joy where Holden can see none. For example, he says that “if you tell old Phoebe something, she knows exactly what the hell you're talking about”, and then affectionately says “[the movie] killed her… She knows the whole goddam movie by heart”, even though Holden later talks about how boring and uninspiring movies are for him (89). So in a sense, Holden’s struggle during this conversation between him and Phoebe is to make sure that Phoebe does not become his relatable peer, at least not yet. 



Comments

  1. I like this analysis of Holden. To me, the way you describe his fascination with retaining Phoebe's innocence opens up a new purpose and slight plot in this book. I previously thought that the book had barely any plot but I think this connection between Phoebe and Holden shows more about Holden than arguably any other character interaction he has in the book.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is up with the Archduke?

  The Archduke Franz Ferdinand is a very forgettable character given that he is only briefly shown twice in Ragtime. To be honest, by the time I finished reading I had completely forgotten that he existed. His main purpose in the book is to interact with Houdini, then die a gruesome death at the end of the book. But it turns out that the Archduke is a real historical figure who actually was murdered by a Serbian nationalist, although it is very unlikely that he would have ever encountered Houdini.  Recall the first time the Archduke is introduced, when he mistakenly congratulates Houdini on inventing the plane. The moment served as a bit of irony, when the the Archduke with “stupid heavy-lidded eyes” and his wife who “yawned delicately” after Houdini’s plane ride, seemed to be completely bored by the spectacular performance (105). My impression was that the Archduke and his wife had nothing better to do with their time, and were being aimlessly led around as figureheads. It’s ...

Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit - COA Novel

Quick background on Oranges are Not The Only Fruit by Jeanette Winterson: this is a memoir centered around a girl questioning her sexuality within the bounds of a conservative Christian family, and the Christian faith to which she is devoted. So not only is the protagonist, Jeanette Winterson, struggling with her mother’s (called “Mother” in the book) disapproval of her newly discovered identity, she must also grapple with the disapproval of her church, and what it would mean to abandon the community that she loves so dearly.  Winterson’s masterful ability to capture the inner turmoil that coming of age often entails made the story particularly believable. In many ways parents, and in Jeanette’s case the church, provide their children with the very first example of what being a good adult means, so the novel begins during Jeanette’s childhood to demonstrate her willingness to internalize the beliefs of the community that surrounds her. This is when she first hears Mother refer to ...

Can Money Buy Happiness?

Prompt: Can Money buy you Happiness? That’s a definite no for me. In fact, I would go as far as to say that money can’t buy happiness for any human, at least in the way that people traditionally ask the question. For many people, this question brings to mind material wealth to an extreme, and whether that would make someone happy. Time after time, the myth has been disproven that having extravagant amounts of money to spend on mostly material things will make you happy. Instead, I would like to think about this question in a different light. Paradoxically, I do actually believe that more money would make many people happier. The reason I am so vehement that more money wouldn’t make me happy is because I am a middle class person who has all of my basic needs met. I have all of the opportunities I could ask for, and while I don’t claim that my life is always easy, almost none of my problems could be solved by gaining more money, and I don’t think having more material wealth would make me...