Skip to main content

What is up with Evelyn and the little girl?

At first glance, Evelyn Nesbit’s relationship with the little girl seems sweet, almost motherly, but something about Doctorow's descriptions left me feeling uneasy. Evelyn sees a beautiful little girl, and then becomes so enamored with her that she has to go visit her every single day. Doctorow calls the little girl Evelyn’s “new love interest”, says she is “aroused” when dreaming about the girl, and makes other very creepy remarks of that nature (45-46). Not to mention the bathing scene, which could have definitely been excluded or edited, which ends with a kiss on the lips. I realize that some people kiss their parents on the lips, so this could be read as a motherly gesture, but adding that action to everything else Evelyn has thought and done, it feels a bit creepy. Yet Doctorow may have a point in writing about Evelyn’s infatuation. 

In the scene after Goldman’s speech, she talks to Evelyn about society sexualizing women, and how Eveyln profits off of that. Goldman says “you’re nothing more than a clever prostitute. You accepted the conditions in which you found yourself and triumphed” (56). Doctorow could be making a point that a character like Evelyn, who has been victimized by the systems in society she has known her whole life, is doomed to continue the cycle. It’s an interesting point: even those made victim by a system may continue to perpetuate the same system. So Evelyn’s instinct to sexualize the little girl is derived from her own treatment in society. The fact that Evelyn chooses a family which is already victim to so many systems as immigrants and a wage worker/artist, may be an observation of the many levels of victimization and oppression that a poor family faces.

Her relationship with the little girl could also be read as motherly. After herself being sexualized her entire life, she may have felt a desire to take care of a girl she thought might suffer a similar fate. Although this scenario is possible, I personally don’t think that Evelyn would continue to sexualize the little girl if her intentions were motherly. Admittedly, sometimes it is difficult to determine who is speaking during the chapters with Evelyn and the little girl. There may be a distinction between what Evelyn is thinking and how the author describes the situation, like the bathing scene (in which case Doctorow is very creepy). 

Maybe Doctorow is trying to make the reader feel uneasy about some American attitudes towards children, specifically little girls, by sexualizing the little girl. Or maybe this type of attitude was so common during the 1970s that he didn’t even think twice about writing about a little girl in this way. I’m not sure.

 

Comments

  1. ah yes doctorow is just extremely creepy. The fact that he even thought about writing these scenes (along with several others that go unmentioned here due to irrelevancy to this particular topic) is just beyond unsettling. I very much agree with you here- the entire relation Evelyn has with this young girl is creepy and obsessive in a very negative manner- it's definetly not something to skip over. On top of that you have the whole bit about Evelyn wanting to kidnap her from her father...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great job! I really find your analysis of Evelyn's relationship with the little girl clarifying and I agree with your points. Evelyn's past trauma and the way she has been sexualized may lead her to have a more unhealthy obsession, rather than motherly affection, for the little girl, in whom she may see a hint of her young and innocent self in.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree that it's very weird. I could let a lot of the individual weird parts slide, but add them together and something is definitely off. Especially when paired with Evelyn's thoughts about kidnapping the girl. She's "trying to help," but is also willing to act in ways that go against the girls' best interests to have her for herself.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is some great analysis! I agree that their relationship definitely does seem creepy, but I think it could partially be because Evelyn is a but narcissistic. She continually acts infatuated over The Little Girl even though Tateh is clearly uncomfortable. I think she has a bit of a savior complex in that she feels like she can better provide for the girl due to her wealth, but also what she thinks as her shared experiences with The Little Girl. She sees herself in the girl and uses that as an excuse to treat her however she thinks is right.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I like how you make a connection with Evelyn's interest in the little girl and how society has sexualized Evelyn and women alike in general. Evelyn being intrigued by Tateh's daughter could derive from how Evelyn herself is viewed, so she uses those same standards when observing others. I think that's why Evelyn made a distinction between Tateh's daughter and the other children when she first saw her in the street. Your blog brings up good dialogue and a reason for Evelyn's fascination with the little girl.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm glad I wasn't the only one who noticed this, I was genuinely concerned as I was reading. I definitely agree with your points, I personally interpreted it as her not really knowing any other way to treat her (because Evelyn has been treated like that her whole life), so I believe that she literally has no clue that this behavior is abnormal.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I was equally weirded out by Evelyn's relationship to the Little Girl, and I kept hoping to get some sort of clarification as we read but it never came. I think both of your interpretations are perfectly plausible but I couldn't tell you which one I see applying to the story more- they both more or less fit. I can't imagine what Doctorow was getting at here, what could possibly have been the point of all those chapters he devoted, when we didn't even get a clear lesson, or point he was trying to convey, or even clarity on what Evelyn's intentions were in the long run or the nature of her feelings. Extremely odd, and I appreciate your attempt at bringing some light to it. Judging from the comments, a lot of us were wondering the same things.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is up with the Archduke?

  The Archduke Franz Ferdinand is a very forgettable character given that he is only briefly shown twice in Ragtime. To be honest, by the time I finished reading I had completely forgotten that he existed. His main purpose in the book is to interact with Houdini, then die a gruesome death at the end of the book. But it turns out that the Archduke is a real historical figure who actually was murdered by a Serbian nationalist, although it is very unlikely that he would have ever encountered Houdini.  Recall the first time the Archduke is introduced, when he mistakenly congratulates Houdini on inventing the plane. The moment served as a bit of irony, when the the Archduke with “stupid heavy-lidded eyes” and his wife who “yawned delicately” after Houdini’s plane ride, seemed to be completely bored by the spectacular performance (105). My impression was that the Archduke and his wife had nothing better to do with their time, and were being aimlessly led around as figureheads. It’s ...

Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit - COA Novel

Quick background on Oranges are Not The Only Fruit by Jeanette Winterson: this is a memoir centered around a girl questioning her sexuality within the bounds of a conservative Christian family, and the Christian faith to which she is devoted. So not only is the protagonist, Jeanette Winterson, struggling with her mother’s (called “Mother” in the book) disapproval of her newly discovered identity, she must also grapple with the disapproval of her church, and what it would mean to abandon the community that she loves so dearly.  Winterson’s masterful ability to capture the inner turmoil that coming of age often entails made the story particularly believable. In many ways parents, and in Jeanette’s case the church, provide their children with the very first example of what being a good adult means, so the novel begins during Jeanette’s childhood to demonstrate her willingness to internalize the beliefs of the community that surrounds her. This is when she first hears Mother refer to ...

Can Money Buy Happiness?

Prompt: Can Money buy you Happiness? That’s a definite no for me. In fact, I would go as far as to say that money can’t buy happiness for any human, at least in the way that people traditionally ask the question. For many people, this question brings to mind material wealth to an extreme, and whether that would make someone happy. Time after time, the myth has been disproven that having extravagant amounts of money to spend on mostly material things will make you happy. Instead, I would like to think about this question in a different light. Paradoxically, I do actually believe that more money would make many people happier. The reason I am so vehement that more money wouldn’t make me happy is because I am a middle class person who has all of my basic needs met. I have all of the opportunities I could ask for, and while I don’t claim that my life is always easy, almost none of my problems could be solved by gaining more money, and I don’t think having more material wealth would make me...