Skip to main content

What is Up with Berbelang?

Berbelang is part of the art-napping Mu’tafikah, whose goal is to rescue non-western art from museums. The Mu’tafika believe that this art is stolen, because it was taken without permission from original cultures across Africa and Asia. Even worse, the art is kept in a sort of prison (museums). Not everyone has access to museums because of the entrance fee and their general seclusion, so the art is hidden from many people. Oftentimes the original purpose of the art was practical, maybe used in a ritual or as a religious symbol, and keeping it hidden in a museum does a disservice to the artifact. So basically, western nations have kidnapped artifacts, kept them in a place that is difficult to access, and are not using them in the way they were meant to be used.

At first I didn’t understand what this had to do with Jes Grew. After all, those artifacts don’t mean much to people in America, they only mean something to the places from which they came. But as we learn later on, the culture in the countries of origin mean a lot to the progress of Jew Grew in America. When Benoit Battraville arrives on the scene, he explains the effects that Antonism was having in Haiti, and how the Antonists tried to stamp out the Work and VooDoo religion in the process. While America is facing a war of culture, Haiti is experiencing real combat. Importantly, PaPa LaBas comes away from this meeting with a different perspective on Jew Grew and the Work, as he now understands how global this problem is. 

So back to Berbelang. At the beginning of the book we see him leaving the Mumbo Jumbo Kathedral, as he does not agree with PaPa LaBas’s fascination with Jew Grew. He believes that by returning the “loot” back to their countries of origin he will help “Shango, Shiva, and Quetzalcoatl” rise again (89). After some googling, I discovered that these names belong to deities in Africa. Berbelang believes that the return of artifacts will help those countries re-discover their national and cultural identities, just as the Book would help America and Jes Grew. 

He played an important role by demonstrating the complexity of losing culture. Not only was Jes Grew important, the success of Jes Grew was tied to the identities of countries in Africa, like Haiti. 


Comments

  1. Interesting post! I think Berbelang was an interesting character too, and wish we could have discussed him more in class. I like your analysis of his role in the book as a representation of how culture is lost. Great work!

    ReplyDelete
  2. The return of stolen artifacts is complicated, and it's a problem that doesn't just apply to African culture. Shango is sacred to the Yoruba people in modern-day Nigeria. Shiva is a Hindu diety. Quetzalcoatl is the Aztec god of "the sun and wind, air, and learning" (Wikipedia). All of these cultures had been violently colonized by Europeans. Reed may have intended Jes Grew to refer mostly to Black culture, but the same thinking applies to other oppressed cultures around the world.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Very interesting! I was confused about Berbelang as a character, and your analysis definitely helped clear things up. I think it's cool how Reed ties in Jes Grew with other parts of the world and other timelines as well.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yeah, I wish we'd had a little more time to dig into the Mu'tafikah and Berbelang, and how they fit into the larger Jes Grew context (Reed says they are "compounding the crisis" early in the novel). I think you're nailing the key idea here--that this art that has been "stolen" from its original cultural context represents an effort to kneecap that culture's spiritual or religious life. It's not just that museums are elitist institutions that not everyone has access to, or that the exhibits don't provide enough context for the relics they display--it's a more metaphysical idea that these amulets and sacred objects can literally "reawaken" gods and spirits ("loas" etc.) who have been neutered by these cultural thefts. The metaphor makes a lot of sense, when we consider the British Museum as a virtual "trophy case" from colonialist pillaging of African and Asian cultures. The cultures have indeed been harmed, marginalized, as their art has been "detained" by colonial authorities.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The Mu'Tafikah were definitely one of the less explored and more confusing part of Mumbo Jumbo. I wish Reed has explained how they were connect to Jes Grew in more detail. I like your explanation that bringing the artifact will help these deities rise again. Good post!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Berbelang was definitely a mysterious character in Mumbo Jumbo. He would just occasionally show up and then not be mentioned for another 10 chapters. But, I think he chapters with him in it are very interesting because of how he is a driving force behind the Mu'tafikah side plot and it was interesting to see where that would lead.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is up with the Archduke?

  The Archduke Franz Ferdinand is a very forgettable character given that he is only briefly shown twice in Ragtime. To be honest, by the time I finished reading I had completely forgotten that he existed. His main purpose in the book is to interact with Houdini, then die a gruesome death at the end of the book. But it turns out that the Archduke is a real historical figure who actually was murdered by a Serbian nationalist, although it is very unlikely that he would have ever encountered Houdini.  Recall the first time the Archduke is introduced, when he mistakenly congratulates Houdini on inventing the plane. The moment served as a bit of irony, when the the Archduke with “stupid heavy-lidded eyes” and his wife who “yawned delicately” after Houdini’s plane ride, seemed to be completely bored by the spectacular performance (105). My impression was that the Archduke and his wife had nothing better to do with their time, and were being aimlessly led around as figureheads. It’s ...

Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit - COA Novel

Quick background on Oranges are Not The Only Fruit by Jeanette Winterson: this is a memoir centered around a girl questioning her sexuality within the bounds of a conservative Christian family, and the Christian faith to which she is devoted. So not only is the protagonist, Jeanette Winterson, struggling with her mother’s (called “Mother” in the book) disapproval of her newly discovered identity, she must also grapple with the disapproval of her church, and what it would mean to abandon the community that she loves so dearly.  Winterson’s masterful ability to capture the inner turmoil that coming of age often entails made the story particularly believable. In many ways parents, and in Jeanette’s case the church, provide their children with the very first example of what being a good adult means, so the novel begins during Jeanette’s childhood to demonstrate her willingness to internalize the beliefs of the community that surrounds her. This is when she first hears Mother refer to ...

Can Money Buy Happiness?

Prompt: Can Money buy you Happiness? That’s a definite no for me. In fact, I would go as far as to say that money can’t buy happiness for any human, at least in the way that people traditionally ask the question. For many people, this question brings to mind material wealth to an extreme, and whether that would make someone happy. Time after time, the myth has been disproven that having extravagant amounts of money to spend on mostly material things will make you happy. Instead, I would like to think about this question in a different light. Paradoxically, I do actually believe that more money would make many people happier. The reason I am so vehement that more money wouldn’t make me happy is because I am a middle class person who has all of my basic needs met. I have all of the opportunities I could ask for, and while I don’t claim that my life is always easy, almost none of my problems could be solved by gaining more money, and I don’t think having more material wealth would make me...